FIFA World Cup vs. Super Bowl: Which is the better sporting event?
Fact Box
- The Federation Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) was created in 1904 as a governing body for football across seven national associations: Belgium, Denmark, France, Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, and Switzerland. Now, there are 209 members.
- The Super Bowl grew out of the merger between the NFL and American Football League; their first game was played in 1967 between the Green Bay Packers and the Kansas City Chiefs. The actual title of “Super Bowl” did not come about until 1969.
- The Super Bowl is held once per year, while the World Cup is less frequent, every four years.
- Statista reported that FIFA World Cup viewership reached up to 1 billion people, while the Super Bowl only hit 123 million.
Mark (Super Bowl)
There are several valid reasons why the Super Bowl is simply the better event overall when compared to the World Cup. Firstly, the Super Bowl is a one-night event with a simple premise that is easy to follow. Conversely, the World Cup is stretched out over several weeks and is much more difficult to follow, especially for the uninitiated. While the numbers are quite comparable, according to some, the Super Bowl generates more revenue than the World Cup, making it the most lucrative event in professional sports.
Add all of this to the fact that the World Cup only takes place once every four years, leaving soccer fans without much to look forward to in the interim. Football fans can look forward to knowing that their favorite event will take place like clockwork once a year. The Super Bowl also brings the world of sports and entertainment together in a way that the World Cup does not. The commercials and the halftime show have become must-see culture-making moments. In comparison, the World Cup offers nothing of this variety. The Super Bowl is a spectacle that captivates millions with an iconic NFL experience that even captures global viewers' attention.
Unlike the World Cup, few NFL players will ever get the opportunity to compete in the Super Bowl. It’s tremendously difficult to make it into the NFL in the first place. Therefore, the odds of making it to the Super Bowl are astronomically low. When watching the Super Bowl, we see larger-than-life iconic personalities that don't exist as much in the serious world of World Cup football. When it comes to sports, the Super Bowl is truly incomparable.
Rob (World Cup)
Comparing the FIFA World Cup, a global event, to the Super Bowl, which finds most of its popularity in North America, is just plainly absurd. If we're looking at the numbers alone (which make the World Cup much bigger by a mile), the Super Bowl is a much smaller event. A fairer comparison would be against the UEFA Champions League. The 2022 FIFA World Cup final, for example, was watched by about 1.5 billion people worldwide, compared to the 2023 Super Bowl's 115 million viewers, which nevertheless broke the record for the most viewers for any Super Bowl edition.
In terms of competition, the World Cup offers much more fun to watch, even for people who don’t know much about actual football—otherwise called 'soccer.' Almost no one outside the US cares about the Super Bowl, and most people watch it for the advertisements and halftime shows.
The Super Bowl is contested among 32 teams from only a single country, and qualifications take barely a month after the season, while the World Cup is contested by 200+ nations, with qualification taking about two years. The Super Bowl is also held yearly, which builds almost zero anticipation, unlike the World Cup, which is held every four years. The impact of the World Cup tournament extends beyond the sporting aspect, and it has a lasting legacy on the host nation(s). It promotes infrastructure development and tourism and inspires a new generation of athletes. On the other hand, the Super Bowl is more of a one-off spectacle with less significant long-term effects on the host city and is known to cause traffic headaches.
0
2
9
Share
0 / 1000