Are plant-based plastics better?
Fact Box
- Plant-based plastics are more commonly known as “bioplastics,” which are derived from vegetable fats or oils, corn starch, recycled food waste, and more.
- The two most used bioplastics are polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA), which can be made using sugars grown from algae, and polylactic acid (PLA), created from sugar found in crops like corn and sugarcane.
- The World Wildlife Fund (WWF) created the Bioplastic Feedstock Alliance (BFA) in 2012 to help bioplastics reach their potential. The alliance works to spread awareness on how material sourcing for plant-based plastic is a cross-cutting issue that affects habitats, wildlife, and people.
- According to Oceana, it’s a myth that plant-based bioplastics are more beneficial to the environment than normal plastics. Only 9% of plastic waste gets recycled, and the remaining 91% enters landfills, the ocean, or is burned.
- Bioplastics currently make up 0.5% of the 400 million tons of plastic produced annually.
James (Yes)
The emergence of plant-based bioplastics presents a hopeful alternative as the globe struggles with the environmental problems caused by conventional plastics. These cutting-edge materials, made from renewable resources like maize, sugarcane, and algae, provide a variety of advantages that are revolutionizing the packaging sector. One of their most important benefits is that plant-based polymers have a reduced carbon footprint. Plant-based plastics are made from renewable resources, unlike petroleum-based plastics, which increase greenhouse gas emissions. These polymers lessen climate impact by relying less on fossil fuels by using plants as feedstock.
Additionally, many plant-based polymers are compostable, greatly increasing their biodegradability, thus providing a healthy and environmentally friendly option. In contrast to conventional plastics, which stay in the environment for years, they decompose into organic matter without emitting dangerous toxins when properly disposed of. The move to a circular economy, where materials are continually recycled and utilized, is supported by this biodegradability. Furthermore, unlike traditional plastics, which frequently include the hormone disruptor Bisphenol A (BPA), plant-based plastics don't contain that. As a result, they are less harmful and more secure for the environment and human health.
The usage of plant-based plastics also aids in addressing the growing issue of microplastics. Traditional plastics eventually degrade into tiny particles that pollute waterways and endanger marine life. By not producing microplastics, biodegradable plant-based polymers reduce a serious hazard to the ecology. Moreover, customers are increasingly prepared to pay extra for ecological packaging as they become more aware of its advantages. Plant-based plastics now have market potential due to consumers' desire for environmentally benign substitutes, which is encouraging research and financial investment.
Dae (No)
Bioplastics may have an eco-friendly reputation when compared to traditional petroleum-based plastics, but they come with their own set of limitations. The fact that they are restricted in how they can be used, require a lot of land resources, have limited biodegradability, and require energy-intensive production processes are all reasons why they are not worth it in the long run.
Bioplastics have lower heat resistance, impact resistance, and barrier properties than petroleum-based plastics, making them unsuitable for industries that demand high durability and strength, such as automotive, electronics, and packaging sectors. Traditional plastics provide superior performance and longevity, which plant-based plastics often cannot provide. Plant-based plastics require substantial land, water, and natural resources. However, such large-scale cultivation for bioplastics competes with food crops, leading to potential food security concerns. Likewise, expanding the industrial-agricultural practices that produce plant-based plastics contributes to deforestation and habitat loss. Using pesticides and fertilizers in cultivation further undermines the sustainability goals associated with bioplastics.
Despite being marketed as biodegradable or compostable, plant-based plastics often require specific conditions to decompose effectively. Many bioplastics can only break down under industrial composting conditions, which are not readily available in most communities. If these plastics end up in landfills or natural environments, they persist for extended periods, contributing to pollution.
The production process for plant-based plastics also demands more energy. Extraction, refining, and conversion of plant materials into usable plastics involve multiple steps and energy-intensive processes such as fermentation, chemical treatment, and polymerization. This increased energy demand leads to negative environmental impacts, including higher greenhouse gas emissions and resource depletion.
Finally, bioplastics are typically more expensive than petroleum-based plastic. So, while plant-based plastics offer potential environmental benefits, their limitations in application, land and resource requirements, biodegradability, and energy-intensive production disqualify the claim that they are “better.”
- 1
- 3
- 18
- Share
0 / 1000